Showing posts with label linux today. Show all posts
Showing posts with label linux today. Show all posts

Friday, April 26, 2013

What is good recording software for linux?

Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?
Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?
Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Friday, April 19, 2013

Whats the difference between Linux and windows hosting? Do i need Linux on my system to linux host?

Q. Whats are the advantages and the disadvantages of Linux hosting? why is it cheaper ? If I make a website in Dreamweaver and Flash CS5, can I Linux host?
Do I need to be wary about something?

A. All websites today currently run on either a Windows web server or a Linux-based server. The vast majority of websites run on a Linux-based platform as Linux has a strong reputation for security and web server performance. With standard (static) HTML-based websites, the web hosting platform doesn't make much difference. When it does make a difference, however, is when the website uses a dynamic scripting technology such as ASP (A Microsoft based technology), or PHP / PERL (Linux based technologies). A Windows-based hosting solution will run a Microsoft Windows server with IIS (Internet Information Server), and is necessary to run an ASP / ASP.NET scripted website. A Linux-based platform is typically used for PHP, Perl, and most other types of websites. Basically, unless your website uses ASP (pages ending in the .asp extention), Windows hosting is not necessary.

As an experienced webmaster I recommend BH web hosting which Iâm sure it would work for you and fulfill all your requirements. They have a really great offer for hosting & I have used them for over 3 yrs now, and have never had a single problem with them.

You can reach reviews about this web hosting provider and its latest DISCOUNT COUPONS at:
http://www.threehosts.com/reviews/1st
Only $3.95 /month (with discount coupon)


BH is compatible with Dreamweaver, just refer to:
http://www.threehosts.com/publish/dreamweaver.html


******IMPORTANT********
* This service was awarded the âBest Web Hosting OF The Yearâ.
*****************************

Hope thi helps.

is the linux for dummies 9th edition book a continuation of the other editions?
Q. I'm went to buy "linux for dummies" today at the book store and noticed that it said 9th edition on it. Does this mean that its just a rewritten,updated version or does it mean that you also need the 1st through 8th editions for it to make sense? in other words, can i buy this book without having to buy the others and still learn all i need to know?

A. It could mean it's been revised 9 times, therefore making it 9th edition, or it is as you said, i am unsure.

What is the best way to run Windows and Linux simultaneously on the same machine?
Q. I don't want to run one system inside another using an emulator or similar system.

I want a system that can run both OS's simultaneously and that I can switch between them.

Today I have both systems on my computer, but I need to shut one down to use the other.

Thank you.

A. You are talking about a virtual machine. There are pros and cons with that system.
Pros You can move back and forth between OSes without rebooting.
Cons If you host OS becomes inoperable (e.g. windows gets a serious virus) you will lose both systems, also if your computer does not have enough resources (ram and cpu power) it can run both OSes more slowly.
There are 2 free virtual machine: vmware and virtualbox.
The first link explains how to run linux in a virtual machine in windows.
The second explains how to windows 7 in a virtual machine on Ubuntu.
You should google both vmware and virtualbox to see which might suit you, and google "install windows 7 on virtualbox linux" to get more info and youtube videos.
Hope this helps.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Thursday, April 11, 2013

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?

Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?
Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.

How do unix and linux such as max os x run more efficantly then windows?
Q. I was using max os x today that someone brught in it was pretty cool but im not convinced its better then windows 7 for multitasking.

It feels more responsive but you cant multitask as easy.

A. There are many misconceptions about Unix, Linux and, Windows. If you look at the hardware level of any computer, Unix and Linux will run more efficiently than Windows will. Unix and Linux will install exactly the drivers in each computer it is installed on, you don't need third party drivers, but in some cases that is the only way some of it may need to run. Linux can multitask and I'm sure Unix will also. Unfortunately Windows dominates the world computer use in the average home and most users will find Unix and Linux a little odd and to some point limited, only because third party vendors and developers make more money developing for Windows. Linux is a programmers and hackers dream, because of all the software you can install and not cost you anything but your time. I work with all three operating systems and find Unix is the hardest one to deal with, in most cases.

If Windows is what you like, then Windows is what it should be as a choice. It takes some time and playing around with Linux, before you will actually like it. Most people don't spend enough time with it and really aren't sure how to install all the software and programs. Sorry I got carried away, and probably didn't answer your question.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Thursday, April 4, 2013

What is the best way to run Windows and Linux simultaneously on the same machine?

Q. I don't want to run one system inside another using an emulator or similar system.

I want a system that can run both OS's simultaneously and that I can switch between them.

Today I have both systems on my computer, but I need to shut one down to use the other.

Thank you.

A. You are talking about a virtual machine. There are pros and cons with that system.
Pros You can move back and forth between OSes without rebooting.
Cons If you host OS becomes inoperable (e.g. windows gets a serious virus) you will lose both systems, also if your computer does not have enough resources (ram and cpu power) it can run both OSes more slowly.
There are 2 free virtual machine: vmware and virtualbox.
The first link explains how to run linux in a virtual machine in windows.
The second explains how to windows 7 in a virtual machine on Ubuntu.
You should google both vmware and virtualbox to see which might suit you, and google "install windows 7 on virtualbox linux" to get more info and youtube videos.
Hope this helps.

What is good recording software for linux?
Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?
Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Saturday, March 23, 2013

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?

Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?
Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.

How do unix and linux such as max os x run more efficantly then windows?
Q. I was using max os x today that someone brught in it was pretty cool but im not convinced its better then windows 7 for multitasking.

It feels more responsive but you cant multitask as easy.

A. There are many misconceptions about Unix, Linux and, Windows. If you look at the hardware level of any computer, Unix and Linux will run more efficiently than Windows will. Unix and Linux will install exactly the drivers in each computer it is installed on, you don't need third party drivers, but in some cases that is the only way some of it may need to run. Linux can multitask and I'm sure Unix will also. Unfortunately Windows dominates the world computer use in the average home and most users will find Unix and Linux a little odd and to some point limited, only because third party vendors and developers make more money developing for Windows. Linux is a programmers and hackers dream, because of all the software you can install and not cost you anything but your time. I work with all three operating systems and find Unix is the hardest one to deal with, in most cases.

If Windows is what you like, then Windows is what it should be as a choice. It takes some time and playing around with Linux, before you will actually like it. Most people don't spend enough time with it and really aren't sure how to install all the software and programs. Sorry I got carried away, and probably didn't answer your question.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?

Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.

How do unix and linux such as max os x run more efficantly then windows?
Q. I was using max os x today that someone brught in it was pretty cool but im not convinced its better then windows 7 for multitasking.

It feels more responsive but you cant multitask as easy.

A. There are many misconceptions about Unix, Linux and, Windows. If you look at the hardware level of any computer, Unix and Linux will run more efficiently than Windows will. Unix and Linux will install exactly the drivers in each computer it is installed on, you don't need third party drivers, but in some cases that is the only way some of it may need to run. Linux can multitask and I'm sure Unix will also. Unfortunately Windows dominates the world computer use in the average home and most users will find Unix and Linux a little odd and to some point limited, only because third party vendors and developers make more money developing for Windows. Linux is a programmers and hackers dream, because of all the software you can install and not cost you anything but your time. I work with all three operating systems and find Unix is the hardest one to deal with, in most cases.

If Windows is what you like, then Windows is what it should be as a choice. It takes some time and playing around with Linux, before you will actually like it. Most people don't spend enough time with it and really aren't sure how to install all the software and programs. Sorry I got carried away, and probably didn't answer your question.

Is there a List of TV Tuners compatible with Linux MCE?
Q. Is there an existing TV Tuners that are compatible with Linux today?

A. http://sagetv.com/requirements.html
see the list here:



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?

Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.

How do unix and linux such as max os x run more efficantly then windows?
Q. I was using max os x today that someone brught in it was pretty cool but im not convinced its better then windows 7 for multitasking.

It feels more responsive but you cant multitask as easy.

A. There are many misconceptions about Unix, Linux and, Windows. If you look at the hardware level of any computer, Unix and Linux will run more efficiently than Windows will. Unix and Linux will install exactly the drivers in each computer it is installed on, you don't need third party drivers, but in some cases that is the only way some of it may need to run. Linux can multitask and I'm sure Unix will also. Unfortunately Windows dominates the world computer use in the average home and most users will find Unix and Linux a little odd and to some point limited, only because third party vendors and developers make more money developing for Windows. Linux is a programmers and hackers dream, because of all the software you can install and not cost you anything but your time. I work with all three operating systems and find Unix is the hardest one to deal with, in most cases.

If Windows is what you like, then Windows is what it should be as a choice. It takes some time and playing around with Linux, before you will actually like it. Most people don't spend enough time with it and really aren't sure how to install all the software and programs. Sorry I got carried away, and probably didn't answer your question.

Is there a List of TV Tuners compatible with Linux MCE?
Q. Is there an existing TV Tuners that are compatible with Linux today?

A. http://sagetv.com/requirements.html
see the list here:



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Thursday, March 7, 2013

What is good recording software for linux?

Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?
Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?
Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Friday, March 1, 2013

Whats the difference between Linux and windows hosting? Do i need Linux on my system to linux host?

Q. Whats are the advantages and the disadvantages of Linux hosting? why is it cheaper ? If I make a website in Dreamweaver and Flash CS5, can I Linux host?
Do I need to be wary about something?

A. All websites today currently run on either a Windows web server or a Linux-based server. The vast majority of websites run on a Linux-based platform as Linux has a strong reputation for security and web server performance. With standard (static) HTML-based websites, the web hosting platform doesn't make much difference. When it does make a difference, however, is when the website uses a dynamic scripting technology such as ASP (A Microsoft based technology), or PHP / PERL (Linux based technologies). A Windows-based hosting solution will run a Microsoft Windows server with IIS (Internet Information Server), and is necessary to run an ASP / ASP.NET scripted website. A Linux-based platform is typically used for PHP, Perl, and most other types of websites. Basically, unless your website uses ASP (pages ending in the .asp extention), Windows hosting is not necessary.

As an experienced webmaster I recommend BH web hosting which Iâm sure it would work for you and fulfill all your requirements. They have a really great offer for hosting & I have used them for over 3 yrs now, and have never had a single problem with them.

You can reach reviews about this web hosting provider and its latest DISCOUNT COUPONS at:
http://www.threehosts.com/reviews/1st
Only $3.95 /month (with discount coupon)


BH is compatible with Dreamweaver, just refer to:
http://www.threehosts.com/publish/dreamweaver.html


******IMPORTANT********
* This service was awarded the âBest Web Hosting OF The Yearâ.
*****************************

Hope thi helps.

What is the best Linux operating system out there today for low speed computers?
Q. I need a good linux OS that would run on 256MB of RAM or less. & with CPU 1GB.

A. I have Xubuntu on my old desktop works good

is the linux for dummies 9th edition book a continuation of the other editions?
Q. I'm went to buy "linux for dummies" today at the book store and noticed that it said 9th edition on it. Does this mean that its just a rewritten,updated version or does it mean that you also need the 1st through 8th editions for it to make sense? in other words, can i buy this book without having to buy the others and still learn all i need to know?

A. It could mean it's been revised 9 times, therefore making it 9th edition, or it is as you said, i am unsure.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Friday, February 22, 2013

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?

Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?
Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?
Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?

Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.

How to connect to a mySQL database on a Linux machine from Windows terminals?
Q. Im planning on a new setup for our office, a Linux server that will have the mySQL database, all other terminals have windows OS like WIn98, Win2000 and tey will need to access the database from the Linux server how to do it?

A. There are so many ways, but I'd recommend making your application web-based and server-side only and access via a web browser. Ancient, unsupported systems like Microsoft Windows 98 are barely able to function in todays world.

Go for a LAMP system.

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?
Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

What is the best way to run Windows and Linux simultaneously on the same machine?

Q. I don't want to run one system inside another using an emulator or similar system.

I want a system that can run both OS's simultaneously and that I can switch between them.

Today I have both systems on my computer, but I need to shut one down to use the other.

Thank you.

A. You are talking about a virtual machine. There are pros and cons with that system.
Pros You can move back and forth between OSes without rebooting.
Cons If you host OS becomes inoperable (e.g. windows gets a serious virus) you will lose both systems, also if your computer does not have enough resources (ram and cpu power) it can run both OSes more slowly.
There are 2 free virtual machine: vmware and virtualbox.
The first link explains how to run linux in a virtual machine in windows.
The second explains how to windows 7 in a virtual machine on Ubuntu.
You should google both vmware and virtualbox to see which might suit you, and google "install windows 7 on virtualbox linux" to get more info and youtube videos.
Hope this helps.

What is good recording software for linux?
Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.

How would computing look today if Bill Gates and Microsoft did not establish themselves in the world market?
Q. Would the software we use today in general be better e.g. more advanced and faster than it is currently?

A. It would be as good, maybe better. Back in the day there were plenty of good operating systems and software packages competing with Microsoft. Gates bought them, outmanuevered them, or bludgeoned them with brute force marketing muscle.

I used and preferred Novell DOS (aka DrDos, originally from Digital Research) to MS-DOS. It required less memory, ran better, and had more features. SuperCalc, QuattroPro, and even Lotus were far superior to Excel in price, performance, and features.

Even today, I use Openoffice instead of Microsoft Office. I've been using Windows as an operating system only because I haven't had time to investigate Linux alternatives.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why is there a difference and what is it between assembly language in Linux and Windows?

Q. I am just wondering why the assembly languages for Windows and Linux are different since they are both based on the x86 architecture. And is there a basic assembly language that doesn't rely on an OS? And if so, what is it?
Ok, if they are the same, then why do the different OSs interact differently with it and is there a way to bypass the OS so that you can just program directly to the computer?

A. For a particular architecture (i.e. CPU type) the assembly language is the same. Realize that even modern intel CPUs have different instruction sets but in general most compilers stick to common instruction sets shared amoung all intel CPUs unless advanced instruction sets (aka extensions) are specifically enabled. MMX was one such extension.

Assembly really doesn't have much to do with device IO or drivers since assembly is *below* the operating system. In assembly, you write to or read from (poke/peek) memory locations which may be mapped to devices or be actual memory. If you are actually programming in assembly (not in a compiled language) then you'd just have to know what locations mean what. This "abstraction" is what the OS and compilers provide to higher level languages.

What you are confused about is binary executable format which *is* os dependent. Every executable binary contains information in it that helps the OS know how to run it and what it's called and so forth. Binaries contain the assembly instructions that needs to run but modern binaries are also often not self standing. The "assembly" code in a binary has to be "loaded" and run along with any other "shared" binary code fragments (i.e. shared libraries). This is where the portability breaks down. On the hardware abstraction side, there is also some runtime adjustments that the OS has to do in order to map the right locations into the assembly code. This is because hardware today are not in fixed predictable locations. The bios can move a device from one memory address to another at boot time or even at run time. This is basically what PnP is. It provides a way for the OS to modify how the bios positions hardware in memory to avoid conflicts. That is why if you are running an OS that is *not* PnP aware, you need to disable the feature in the bios so that the bios will initialize and fix those parameters for the hardware at boot time. Once the OS is done with relocation and device mapping, the "code" that is sent to the CPU is assembly and for all intents and purposes this code would be basically the same no matter what OS is used.

So what are some binary formats that are shared... well, ELF is one. Elf is used on various Unix and Unix-like OSs such as Linux and Solaris. Unfortunately binary compatibility is not a useful reality because it requires all the shared components to be compatible versions and format. In a sense, the WINE project in Linux is an attempt to emulate the Windows HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) in order to "load" a binary and do all of the necessary relocations for IO and shared components that windows does and then send it to the CPU. In a way, WINE is an attempt to create binary compatibility with windows "EXE" files.

How do unix and linux such as max os x run more efficantly then windows?
Q. I was using max os x today that someone brught in it was pretty cool but im not convinced its better then windows 7 for multitasking.

It feels more responsive but you cant multitask as easy.

A. There are many misconceptions about Unix, Linux and, Windows. If you look at the hardware level of any computer, Unix and Linux will run more efficiently than Windows will. Unix and Linux will install exactly the drivers in each computer it is installed on, you don't need third party drivers, but in some cases that is the only way some of it may need to run. Linux can multitask and I'm sure Unix will also. Unfortunately Windows dominates the world computer use in the average home and most users will find Unix and Linux a little odd and to some point limited, only because third party vendors and developers make more money developing for Windows. Linux is a programmers and hackers dream, because of all the software you can install and not cost you anything but your time. I work with all three operating systems and find Unix is the hardest one to deal with, in most cases.

If Windows is what you like, then Windows is what it should be as a choice. It takes some time and playing around with Linux, before you will actually like it. Most people don't spend enough time with it and really aren't sure how to install all the software and programs. Sorry I got carried away, and probably didn't answer your question.

Can you have multiple user accounts on Ubuntu Linux?
Q. I'm trying to persuade my parents to run Linux in addition to Windows Vista on our computer. My question is, can we have multiple user accounts on Linux? Like on Windows?

A. The answer to the question - absolutely
Linux is designed from the ground up as a multi-user system, rather than as an add on the way it works in Widows.
When you create additional users in Linux, that account is created with their own personal space, totally separate from other users. What they do in their space does not affect what another person sees when then use their space. It is a far superior system to what Windows does.

A couple of hints when doing your Linux dual boot system

1. While all major Linux distributions today can partition a Windows hard drive and add Linux to an existing system, there is always the odd case where Windows objects to sharing space with Linux. I have heard that Vista is particularly touchy about it.
So my recommendation is to add a second hard drive to your box. You do not need a big drive, you can get just about any drive sold in a store today and add it to your box.
Then install Linux on the second drive. This way, your Vista drive remains pristine, and Vista goes on happily ignorant that "another OS" exists.
Linux will install a boot loader utility that will allow you to choose the OS you want to boot into.

2. Be prepared to experiment, explore and try new things and ideas. Linux is very different from Windows. Things that are falling off a log easy in Windows can become very difficult in Linux if you keep approaching it "the Windows way"
I have changed distributions, and changed releases within distributions many, many times. I have loaded, unloaded, installed and un-installed apps and distros as I have tried to achieve my goals. Linux has never let me down. There has always been a way, but I am not going to say the way is always smooth or simple.
One thing is for sure, you learn a lot

All that said, I hope your parents let you proceed. As long as you do your work on the second hard drive, the Windows install will be unaffected and that should make them feel a lot better about the whole thing

Drop me a line if I can help

Welcome to Linux



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

is the linux for dummies 9th edition book a continuation of the other editions?

Q. I'm went to buy "linux for dummies" today at the book store and noticed that it said 9th edition on it. Does this mean that its just a rewritten,updated version or does it mean that you also need the 1st through 8th editions for it to make sense? in other words, can i buy this book without having to buy the others and still learn all i need to know?

A. It could mean it's been revised 9 times, therefore making it 9th edition, or it is as you said, i am unsure.

What is the best way to run Windows and Linux simultaneously on the same machine?
Q. I don't want to run one system inside another using an emulator or similar system.

I want a system that can run both OS's simultaneously and that I can switch between them.

Today I have both systems on my computer, but I need to shut one down to use the other.

Thank you.

A. You are talking about a virtual machine. There are pros and cons with that system.
Pros You can move back and forth between OSes without rebooting.
Cons If you host OS becomes inoperable (e.g. windows gets a serious virus) you will lose both systems, also if your computer does not have enough resources (ram and cpu power) it can run both OSes more slowly.
There are 2 free virtual machine: vmware and virtualbox.
The first link explains how to run linux in a virtual machine in windows.
The second explains how to windows 7 in a virtual machine on Ubuntu.
You should google both vmware and virtualbox to see which might suit you, and google "install windows 7 on virtualbox linux" to get more info and youtube videos.
Hope this helps.

What is good recording software for linux?
Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Sunday, February 10, 2013

is the linux for dummies 9th edition book a continuation of the other editions?

Q. I'm went to buy "linux for dummies" today at the book store and noticed that it said 9th edition on it. Does this mean that its just a rewritten,updated version or does it mean that you also need the 1st through 8th editions for it to make sense? in other words, can i buy this book without having to buy the others and still learn all i need to know?

A. It could mean it's been revised 9 times, therefore making it 9th edition, or it is as you said, i am unsure.

What is the best way to run Windows and Linux simultaneously on the same machine?
Q. I don't want to run one system inside another using an emulator or similar system.

I want a system that can run both OS's simultaneously and that I can switch between them.

Today I have both systems on my computer, but I need to shut one down to use the other.

Thank you.

A. You are talking about a virtual machine. There are pros and cons with that system.
Pros You can move back and forth between OSes without rebooting.
Cons If you host OS becomes inoperable (e.g. windows gets a serious virus) you will lose both systems, also if your computer does not have enough resources (ram and cpu power) it can run both OSes more slowly.
There are 2 free virtual machine: vmware and virtualbox.
The first link explains how to run linux in a virtual machine in windows.
The second explains how to windows 7 in a virtual machine on Ubuntu.
You should google both vmware and virtualbox to see which might suit you, and google "install windows 7 on virtualbox linux" to get more info and youtube videos.
Hope this helps.

What is good recording software for linux?
Q. Ive recently started useing ubuntu linux, because it runs better on my computer than windows. Any suggestions for good music recording software? I have An electric keyboard, electric guitar, electric, bass, electric drums, and a sampler (turn tables). Id like something flexible so i can use them all on the same software.

A. Audacity is a the easiest to get jump started and most likely to have drivers for your break out box.

There are several others. If you do a lot of Midi work I suggest Rosegarden. Keyboardists especially tend to favor Rosegarden. I love the interface, full featured but can be picky about which break out boxes it talks too.

Aurdor is another full featured recording software but it's interface is more like Pro Tools while Rosegarden more closely resembles Cakewalk.

Those are the 3 I'd start with. The best way to get them is through your favorite package manager. Synaptic is one of the better ones. Just do a search in synaptic for these packages. They take care of the dependencies for you. Makes installing software on Linux the easiest platform in the world to install software for. Audacity, Rosegarden and Aurdor are all listed in the Multimedia(universe) section in Synaptic. Just check them say yes you want ot install and it's dependencies. Then click on apply when you have selected all the packages you want to install.

You'll also want a good tagger. Easy Tag is solid, I personally prefer Kid3, but there are dozen good ones and Ubuntu comes with Gtag I think it is by default. You should be able to edit ID3 tags through your file browser thought that is a bit tedious.

Installing Lame is a must. If your terrified of a command line you'll also want a Lame front end but to be honest using lame on command line is a no brainer. Open a term window, lame -vbr (name of wave file you want to convert to a mp3) (name you want the MP3 to be)

lame -vbr something.wav something.mp3

This mp3's it using variable bit rate which gives you the best compromise between sound quality and compactness of the output. Most mp3s you download today use lame and it's vbr setting. You get 256k quality where it counts but where there's lots of quiet you get higher compression ratios usually saving a couple megs on the final output without reducing the quality any.

There are dozens of Lame front ends to let you do that without using a command line. Just search synaptic for lame and you'll find them. Audacity, Rosegarden and Audor will plug into Lame and allow you to output MP3s directly as well once you have lame installed. Personally I like to hand rip my stuff, then tag it w/mix & version. Then rename & retag anything I'm sending out to people or the public. Saves listening to 10 copies of the same tune to find that ONE mix you were looking for.

As for sampler software, again there are programs similar to Acid and you can use Rosegarden and Audor though they are not designed for it to do some of it. I don't sample so I can't recommend which are best of breed in that area.

What break out box you have is the trickiest part. I suggest using Maudio or going direct through USB if that's an option. Maudio is decently supported in Linux. Avoid Tascam, nearly impossible to get Linux to talk to a Tascam device.



Nec Projector Review

Plastic Shed Reviews

Ati Graphic Reviews

Nurse Uniforms Reviews

Cabochons Reviews

Inflatable Water Slides Reviews

Barcode Scanner Reviews

Older Posts Home